In ‘The architecture of happiness’ Alain de Botton marks: “If our interest for buildings and objects truly is being defined by how they appear to us and in which way they perform their material existence, it would be praiseworthy to sedulously examine the quaint process, according to which, the structures made from stone, steel, concrete, wood and glass are able to communicate; yet in infrequent occasions they give the impression of talking to us about important and emotive things.’’[1] One can say that this statement determines the meaning of what would be considered good architecture. Fortunately such examples are seen even more frequently nowadays.